Shouting out about sex (workers): The debate where everyone wants to silence each other
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Everyone wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die.
Preparing the books to read every day is enjoyable for many people. However, there are still many people who also don't like reading. This is a problem. But, when you can support others to start reading, it will be better. One of the books that can be recommended for new readers is everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die. This book is not kind of difficult book to read. It can b...
متن کاملDo Causes Crowd Each Other Out? Evidence From Tornado Strikes
Does charitable giving respond to new demands, and if so, does the response come at the expense of other charitable causes? To answer these questions we exploit exogenous variation in need arising from the random event of a nearby tornado. We use location fixed effects estimators and examine changes in charitable donations claimed for tax deductions in IRS data on individual income taxes by geo...
متن کاملWhere-What Network 1: “Where” and “What” Assist Each Other Through Top-down Connections
This paper describes the design of a single learning network that integrates both object location (“where”) and object type (“what”), from images of learned objects in natural complex backgrounds. The in-place learning algorithm is used to develop the internal representation (including synaptic bottomup and top-down weights of every neuron) in the network, such that every neuron is responsible ...
متن کاملTalking Past Each Other: Making Sense of the Debate over Electronic Publication
This paper discusses the implications electronic dissemination for the peer-reviewed serial publication system. To make sense of this complex issue, it is helpful to view it from the perspective of the origins of the system and its three core functions, the ranking of scholarship, facilitating interactive communication among scholars, and creating a comprehensive archive of scholarly and scient...
متن کاملMoral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological development? With this issue as its starting point, the study reported on here, intended to furth...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Index on Censorship
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0306-4220,1746-6067
DOI: 10.1177/0306422015622932